"When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth" Sherlock Holmes
First things first, Let us observe what it is, that we are actually investigating :
We start to investigate the possible causes for such an outcome:
1. Airplane impact ? According to WTC engineers, the towers were specifically designed and tested to withstand the impact resulting from the collision of a large jetliner.
More here : http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/design.html The buildings had more than 1,000 times the mass of the aircraft and had been designed to resist steady wind loads of 30 times the weight of the aircraft, there was no significant wind on September 11, the outer perimeter columns were only stressed before the impact to around 1/3 of their 200 MPa design allowable. The only individual metal component of the aircraft that is comparable in strength to the box perimeter columns of the WTC is the keel beam at the bottom of the aircraft fuselage. While the aircraft impact undoubtedly destroyed several columns in the WTC perimeter wall, the number of columns lost on the initial impact was not large and the loads were shifted to remaining columns in this highly redundant structure. http://911research.wtc7.net/disinfo/experts/articles/eagar_jom/eagar_0112.html The Jet fuel ignited and burned out almost immediately upon impact and mostly outside of the tower.
2. Fires ? According to live radio communications of firefighters in the tower - the fires were minimal :
According to Brian Clark who was above the hit zone and walked all the way down to safety - the fires were minimal :
Photos of Edna Cintron RIP waving , standing smack in the middle of the impact hole - proves there was no immense heat not even in the center of the crash :
Flir infrared readings show temperatures nowhere near weakening steel temperatures even at the hottest spots :
3. Thermate ? This is how painted Tharmite reacts on a steel beam :
We should have observed WTC light up like a Christmas tree while collapsing. But we clearly don’t :
Perhaps in the Inner side of the box Columns ?
If it was Thermate or any other heat/fire creating incendiary, the spire would have had the appearance of a flaming KKK cross stuck on ones front lawn.
And this nano thermate is supposed to keep an underground heat of 1500 degrees for 15 weeks? How much Thermate is needed to sustain underground heat of 1500 degrees for 15 weeks? “invisible super top secret super thermate’ would have to have been 2.14 Million miles long and would to have weighed approximately 1.176 Billion pounds. ” (!!!) Calculated here: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EdWard-MD/message/481
Detailed information about Thermate Theory here
4. Mini Nukes ? This is a visual of a mini nuke detonation:
And this is only a 0.1 kiloton single nuke explosion. Where was that boom (at least 1 mini nuke) in the WTC demolition ? Where was that huge light flash? Where was that ball of fire? not to mention no EMP .
5. Underground Nuclear demolition ?
Dimitri Khalezov testimony : 1. As an Officer in the USSR nuclear intelligence he had prior knowledge that there were emergency underground demolition nukes placed under the towers when they were built (the Soviets knew this as part of the 1970s USSR-USA nuclear disclosure treaties) .
This is where Khalzov Places the Nukes (screen shot of part 16)
Does WTC4 get pulverized closest to the nuke? Absolutely. but further away corner from nuke stays standing
Does WTC3 get damaged too from wtc2 falling debris (first tower to collapse)? Absolutely. but is not pulverized to the ground
WTC3 will get pulverized when WTC1 nuke is detonated. once again further away corner stays standing
See the first LIDAR photo for the placements of the remains of WTC 4 and 3. Does WTC6 which is severely damaged ,pulverize completely too ? (its right next to wtc1) – it doesn’t. its way off the nuke radius.
Why did WTC 7 appear to collapse in a different way to WTC 1,2 collapses : (As explained in the interview segment above) The destruction of the towers is not being done by nuke heat – but rather by mechanical pressure, Turns all matter instantly to solid dust (the form still keeps its shape like a sand castle). underground nuke creates 3 phenomena: 1. cavity from vaporized rock – white area 2.crushed zone (solid dust) – blue area 3. damaged zone – green area
But regarding WTC 1,2 even the nuke couldn’t reach all the way up the tower That big chunk falling down – scatters the already dustified tower beneath it – hence a collapse for the top is observed . That is why WTC7 looks so different- it is much shorter, the pulverization effect reached it all the way to the top. So it falls down “normally” there is no solid material to fall on top of it.
Conclusion : The Government is promoting a theory which is in direct conflict with the evidence. And it is doing the same regarding the planes and the amateur pilot Arab hijackers story as well.
No professional experienced pilot is able to reproduce the maneuvers The official conspiracy theory Villains are allegedly managing to perform. It is both true to the Pentagon incident
And the NY WTC incident
One is reminded of the unreproducible Lee Harvey Oswald shots in the JFK assassination
The 767 is a trusty workhorse used by airlines the world over. It comes in three types, the 200, 300 and 400 series with increasing fuselage length and increasing capacity. Flight 175 (N612UA) is a Boeing 767–222 .
The nose section of a 200 series, A, is shorter than the wing assembly, B. Whereas for the 300 series A is longer than B :
The plane which hit the south tower was not and could not possibly have been Flight 175 . That’s established fact, based on first hand, recorded in real time, physical reality. The plane's fuselage is too long to be a Boeing 767-200.